Authors: Jamie Allen, DO, Chief Resident, Emergency Medicine Residency, Lehigh Valley Health Network; Susan R. Wilcox, MD, FACEP, Division Chief, Critical Care, Department of Emergency Medicine, Associate Professor of Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Associate Chief Medical Officer, Boston MedFlight; and Nicholas Johnson, MD, FACEP, Assistant Professor Emergency Medicine, Adjunct Assistant Professor Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, & Sleep Medicine, Associate Program Director, Critical Care Medicine Fellowship.
- Admission or transfer to the ICU should be based on your facility’s criteria for patients meeting “ICU-level care.”
- The average number of days of symptoms for patients requiring hospitalization is 3 to 11 days.
- The average number of days of ICU admission is 9 to 10 days of illness.
- The primary causes of ICU admission include hypoxic respiratory failure and ARDS.
Additional resources
Treatment of hypoxemia
- NIPPV: Use of BiPAP/CPAP is not routinely recommended due to the risk of aerosolization and an increased 90-day mortality rate, as compared to patients receiving high-flow oxygen.
- FLORALI study: There was no significant difference in the overall intubation rates between NIPPV, a nonrebreather mask, and high-flow oxygen, but there was a decreased 90-day mortality rate for patients receiving high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC).
- In absence of indication for endotracheal intubation, a closely monitored trial of NIPPV for adults can be used when HFNC is unavailable.
- NIPPV should be used in a negative-pressure room, as able. The expiratory limb should be fitted with a viral filter and a tight mask seal should be ensured. Providers caring for patients receiving NIPPV should use airborne precautions.
- HFNC: HFNC is the preferred noninvasive method of oxygenation in the ICU-level patient.
- Mechanical ventilation: Low tidal volume ventilation (≤6 ml/kg of predicted body weight) should be used. Plateau pressure should be <30 cmH20. PEEP should be titrated using PEEP ladder or to minimize driving pressure (Plateau-PEEP). Respiratory rate should be set to maintain pH >7.15, if possible. FiO2 and PEEP should be titrated to maintain SpO2 88%-92% or PaO2 >55 mmHg. Additional information can be found in the ARDSnet protocol.
Rapid sequence intubation recommendations
- Perform intubation in a negative-pressure room whenever possible.
- Perform preoxygenation with nasal cannula, a nonrebreather mask, or high-flow nasal cannula, as indicated by the degree of hypoxia.
- Avoid bag-valve-mask (BVM) ventilation whenever possible.
- Rapid sequence intubation is the preferred method.
- Ketamine or etomidate is a reasonable induction agent.
- Succinylcholine or rocuronium 1.5 mg/kg should be used to minimize the time to onset.
- Wait until the neuromuscular block (NMB) has taken full effect to start laryngoscopy to reduce the risk of coughing.
- Propofol may be used for induction, but caution should be taken with dose-dependent hypotension and QTc prolongation if the patient is also receiving azithromycin/hydroxychloroquine.
- Post-induction vasopressor support may be required.
- Use of video laryngoscopy is preferred. Maximize first-pass success, and maintain clinician distance from the airway.
- Intubation should be performed by the most experienced airway manager.
- If BVM is required post intubation, fully inflate the cuff, and use a viral filter prior to bagging or connecting the ventilator.
- Use of a viral filter on BVM and in the ventilatory circuit is strongly recommended.
- Use of EtCO2 monitoring and visualization of the tube passing the cords are preferred for tube placement confirmation. (Avoid excess exposure to x-ray technicians; avoid close-contact auscultation.)
Sedation of the ventilated Covid-19 patient
- Propofol
- A national shortage of available propofol may be looming.
- QTc prolongation: Caution should be used in patients also receiving azithromycin/hydroxychloroquine.
- Hypertriglyceridemia has been noted in critically ill COVID-19 patients.
- Caution should be used with prolonged propofol infusions to avoid propofol infusion syndrome.
- Acts on GABA receptors; sedative/hypnotic
- Considerations:
- Benzodiazepines
- Benzodiazepines may be preferred over propofol due to a lack of QTc prolongation.
- There is less dose-dependent hypotension at therapeutic levels (see “Hemodynamic Characteristics of Midazolam, Propofol, and Dexmedetomidine in Healthy Volunteers”).
- Caution should be used with lorazepam and diazepam infusions for propylene-glycol toxicity (eg, unexplained metabolic acidosis, elevated anion gap, hyperosmolality, and then clinical deterioration).
- Act on GABA receptors
- Considerations:
- Dexmedetomidine
- Central acting alpha-2 agonist
- Dexmedetomidine is not recommended as the initial sedative of choice, or at all (preferred in vent weaning, sedation <24 hours).
- May be suitable for patients undergoing ventilator weaning and breathing trials.
Analgesia of the ventilated COVID-19 patient
- Multiple options include fentanyl, morphine, and dilaudid.
- Considerations: National fentanyl shortages may occur; consider other opioid infusions.
- NSAIDs: According to the WHO on March 19, there is no scientific evidence to suggest NSAIDs worsen COVID; use NSAIDs cautiously in all critically ill patients.
Vasopressor therapy in the COVID-19 patient
- Agents:
- Norepinephrine
- Vasopressin
- Epinephrine
- Phenylephrine
- Considerations:
- Choice of agents and goals of therapy should still be consistent with the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines.
- Norepinephrine remains the first-line agent of choice for shock.
- Second-line therapy: vasopressin (to raise MAP or decrease norepinephrine dose) or epinephrine added to norepinephrine to maintain MAP >65 mm Hg
- Epinephrine is recommended as the first-line agent for decreased cardiac output or a bradycardic patient.
- Inotropic agents (dobutamine, milrinone) can be considered in patients who demonstrate myocardial dysfunction.
- Bhatraju PK, Ghassemieh BJ, Nichols M, et al. COVID-19 in critically ill patients in the Seattle region - case series [published online ahead of print, 2020 Mar 30]. N Engl J Med. 2020;10.1056/NEJMoa2004500. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2004500
- This case series of patients from Seattle describes no new myocardial dysfunction on echocardiogram, although it is a small sample size (N = 9).
Use of paralytics in the mechanically ventilated COVID-19 ARDS patient
- Nondepolarizing agent
- Onset 1 minute
- Recovery time 30 to 40 minutes
- Nondepolarizing agent
- Onset 2 to 3 minutes
- Recovery time 30 to 45 minutes
- Onset 5 to 7 minutes
- Recovery 40 seconds to 5 minutes
- Metabolized via Hofmann degradation
- Use in the setting of liver or renal dysfunction.
- Considerations:
- The original ACURASYS study by Papazian et al in 2010 showed 9.1% absolute difference in the 90-day mortality rate in the paralyzed group, although this is not statistically significant.
- Results met significance after being controlled for baseline PaO2:FiO2, SAPS II, and plateau pressure.
- The ROSE trial from 2019 showed no difference in the primary outcome or 90-day mortality rate.
- For patients who are sedated but remain dyssynchronous with a ventilator, a NMB is appropriate to facilitate lung-protective ventilation.
- Adequate deep sedation must be given to all paralyzed patients.
Use of prone positioning in ARDS
- A benefit was demonstrated in the PROSEVA trial by Guérin et al in mechanically ventilated patients with severe ARDS (inclusion: ARDS <36 hours; PaO2:FIO2 <150; FIO2 of at least 60%; PEEP >5; Tv: ≤6 ml/kg)
- Benefits: improved oxygenation via improved V/Q matching; keeps alveoli open and evenly distributed at end-expiration to avoid ventilator-induced lung injury
- Prone positioning for mechanically ventilated patients is recommended for 12 to 16 hours per day.
- Prone positioning can be considered in patients on nasal cannula and high-flow oxygen (ie, non-mechanically ventilated patients). It appears safe and may improve oxygenation, but its impact on mortality, ventilator-free days, or longer-term outcomes is unclear.
- Prone positioning for non-intubated patients can be done in cycles of 2-4 hours (as tolerated) with brief periods in the supine position for comfort.
- Beneficial in patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS PaO2:FIO2 <150
- The decision to prone a patient should generally be made in conjunction with and after discussion with a critical care attending.
- Multiple complications (eg, device dislodgement, , difficult to perform procedures, facial edema, skin breakdown,; labor intensive)
- Patients should be transitioned back to the supine position at least every 16 hours per the PROSEVA protocol. If patients meet the following criteria >4 hours after returning to the supine position, proning cycles should be stopped. If they do not meet the criteria below, proning cycles should continue.
- PROSEVA criteria for stopping proning improvement in oxygenation: Supine; PaO2:FIO2 ≥150 with PEEP <10 and FiO2 ≤60%, a decrease in the PaO2:FIO2 of more than 20% relative to the ratio in the supine position, before two consecutive prone sessions; or complications occurring during a prone session and leading to its immediate interruption
Contraindications:
- Untrained staff
- Increased intracranial pressure; increased abdominal pressure
- Abdominal and/or chest wounds
- Cervical spine injury
- Extreme obesity
- Hemodynamic instability
Use of ECMO for COVID-19 patients
- Veno-venous ECMO is most commonly used.
- 551 suspected or confirmed cases of COVID-19 are on ECMO (worldwide) (as of April 24, 2020).
- 52/122 (42%) of patients taken off ECMO thus far have been discharged alive.
- Current indications (as of April 1, 2020):
- pH <7.25 with PaCO2 >60 for more than 6 hours and no contraindications → use ECMO
- Try adjunctive measures first:
- Prone positioning (unless contraindicated), NMB, high PEEP ventilation, inhaled pulmonary vasodilators, or recruitment maneuvers
- If adjunctive measures fail and any of the following are present and no contraindication to ECMO → use ECMO:
- P/f <80 for more than 6 hours
- P/f <50 for more than 3 hours
- pH <7.25 with PaCO2 >60 for more than 6 hours
- If P/f ratio >150:
- If P/f ratio <150:
- Contraindications:
- Terminal disease, severe CNS damage, DNR status, and advanced directives refusing such therapy
- More information is available via the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO):
- This PDF is available in other languages.
Additional references
- Gattinoni L, Caironi P, Cressoni M, et al. Lung recruitment in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(17):1775-1786. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa052052
- Bhatraju PK, Ghassemieh BJ, Nichols M, et al. Covid-19 in Critically ill patients in the Seattle region - case series [published online ahead of print, 2020 Mar 30]. N Engl J Med. 2020;10.1056/NEJMoa2004500. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2004500
- Ware LB, Matthay MA. The acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(18):1334-1349. doi:10.1056/NEJM200005043421806
- Barrot L, Asfar P, Mauny F, et al. Liberal or conservative oxygen therapy for acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(11):999-1008. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1916431
- Caputo ND, Strayer RJ, Levitan R. Early self-proning in awake, non-intubated patients in the emergency department: a single ED's experience during the COVID-19 pandemic [published online ahead of print, 2020 Apr 22]. Acad Emerg Med. 2020;10.1111/acem.13994. doi:10.1111/acem.13994
- Guérin C, Reignier J, Richard JC, et al. PROSEVA Study Group. Prone Positioning in Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. N Engl J Med (2013);368: 2159–2168.
- Sud S, Friedrich J, Adhikari N, et al. Effect of prone positioning during mechanical ventilation on mortality among patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ (2014);186 (10): 381-390.